FinTech · SaaS · MVP Development

From Pitch Deck to Series A in 10 Weeks

AED 4.4MSeed round raised

The Situation

A Dubai-based fintech founder had a validated idea and a lead investor interested — but no product. His previous development partner had burned through 4 months and AED 180,000 with nothing shippable to show for it. The investor gave him a deadline: demonstrate a working product in 12 weeks or the term sheet dies.

He found us through a strategic audit we'd done on his existing codebase. The audit revealed the previous team had over-architected a prototype that should have been lean. We showed him exactly where the money went and why it didn't produce results.

What We Built

A fully functional fintech MVP — multi-currency transaction processing, KYC/AML compliance integration, user onboarding flow, admin dashboard, and investor-ready analytics. Not a prototype. A working product his pilot users actually transacted through.

Cross-platform mobile application deployed to both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Real users. Real transactions. Real traction data for the investor pitch.

Architecture designed for scale from day one — when the Series A closed, the platform handled 10x load without a rewrite.

The Results

Time to working product
Before
4 months (nothing shipped)
After
10 weeks (live product)
Development spend
Before
AED 180,000 (wasted)
After
AED 145,000 (shipped)
Funding outcome
Before
Term sheet expiring
After
AED 4.4M seed raised
App Store status
Before
None
After
Live on iOS + Android
Pilot users (month 1)
Before
0
After
340+

What Made This Work

We killed 60% of the features. The investor needed to see transaction flow and traction, not an admin panel with 47 settings. We launched what mattered and built the rest post-funding.

Infrastructure-as-code from day one meant the platform scaled without emergency rewrites when user growth spiked.

Weekly demos, not monthly status reports. The founder and his investor saw progress every 7 days. Confidence stayed high, decisions stayed fast.

What We'd Do Differently

The 12-week timeline worked because the founder was technical and could make decisions fast. A non-technical founder with committee-based approvals would have needed 16-18 weeks for the same scope. Our timelines assume one decision-maker with authority — if that's not your structure, we'll scope accordingly.

Ready for results like these?

Tell us what's costing you money. We'll show you what we'd build to fix it.