, 01/ 03
We killed 60% of the features. The investor needed to see transaction flow and traction, not an admin panel with 47 settings. We launched what mattered and built the rest post funding.
FICAITION · case file · fintech-saas-to-series-a.case
From Pitch Deck to Series A in 10 Weeks
4.4M Seed round raised
FinTech · SaaS · MVP Development
SHIPPED
OWNED BY CLIENT
── THE SITUATION
Where it started.
A Dubai based fintech founder had a validated idea and a lead investor interested, but no product. His previous development partner had burned through 4 months and 180,000 with nothing shippable to show for it. The investor gave him a deadline: demonstrate a working product in 12 weeks or the term sheet dies.
He found us through a strategic audit we'd done on his existing codebase. The audit revealed the previous team had over architected a prototype that should have been lean. We showed him exactly where the money went and why it didn't produce results.
── WHAT WE BUILT
The build.
A fully functional fintech MVP: multi currency transaction processing, KYC and AML compliance integration, user onboarding flow, admin dashboard, and investor ready analytics. Not a prototype. A working product his pilot users actually transacted through.
Cross platform mobile application deployed to both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Real users. Real transactions. Real traction data for the investor pitch.
Architecture designed for scale from day one. When the Series A closed, the platform handled 10x load without a rewrite.
── THE RESULTS
The numbers.
Time to working product
10 weeks (live product)
from 4 months (nothing shipped)
Development spend
145,000 (shipped)
from 180,000 (wasted)
Funding outcome
4.4M seed raised
from Term sheet expiring
App Store status
Live on iOS + Android
from None
Pilot users (month 1)
340+
from 0
── WHAT MADE THIS WORK
The decisions behind it.
, 02/ 03
Infrastructure as code from day one meant the platform scaled without emergency rewrites when user growth spiked.
, 03/ 03
Weekly demos, not monthly status reports. The founder and his investor saw progress every 7 days. Confidence stayed high, decisions stayed fast.
── WHAT WE'D DO DIFFERENTLY
The 12 week timeline worked because the founder was technical and could make decisions fast. A non technical founder with committee based approvals would have needed 16 to 18 weeks for the same scope. Our timelines assume one decision maker with authority. If that is not your structure, we scope accordingly.
Client details anonymized under NDA. Detailed case studies with metrics available on request.
YOUR BUILD NEXT
Ready for results like these?
Tell us what is costing you money. We will show you what we would build to fix it.